笔记本电脑与台式机 – 恩维迪亚RTX 2070 对照!
Lets compare Nvidia, Rtx 2070 performance between a laptop and desktop to see what the differences are in games and applications. Lets start with the spec differences between the desktop and laptop 2070. 他们, similar for the most part same GPU core same amount of CUDA cores and memory.. The key difference is the desktop 2070 has faster memory and higher power limit.. 桌面选项具有更高的 TDP, 这是可能由于冷却, 与笔记本电脑的较小空间相比， 限制较小。. 功率更多等于热量, so the laptop runs with a lower power limit and more power will result in more performance. With higher clock, 速度. For the laptop Ill be testing with a Clevo chassis. 元盒总理 AI, 这里在澳大利亚, 埃鲁克特龙 Thicc 15 在美国或 Xmg 顶点 15 在欧洲. Whats interesting, is that this laptop uses the AM4 socket and has a desktop Ryzen. 7. 3700X processor inside. – 这让我做一个有点公平的比较， 因为我测试, my desktop PC with the same 3700X CPU and Aorus Extreme 2070 从千兆字节。. 内存有区别, 虽然大多数 Ddr4 3200 笔记本电脑内存在 CL22 运行, 而 CL16 在桌面端更常见. 而不是试图匹配这些我离开了他们, 是, 我觉得它最好代表笔记本电脑和桌面之间的差异. 两个设置都使用相同版本的 Windows 和 Nvidia 驱动程序进行了测试, 所以让我们进入结果.
Well start out by comparing 15 不同的游戏, then look at thermals power draw and other applications. 之后. 红色死亡救赎 2 测试使用游戏基准. 工具. Ive got the desktop PC shown by the purple, bars and laptop shown by the red bars. 下面. 我还测试了所有可用的设置预设, 排列在左侧, 最低在底部到最高顶部。. 如预期的那样, 桌面是更快的所有设置与 15 higher average frame rate at ultra settings. 战场 5 在两台笔记本电脑上运行游戏的同一部分，在活动模式下进行测试。. The desktop 2070 again saw a 15 提升至平均 Fps. 在超设置下, 虽然, strangely the laptop was scoring better in 1 low performance at all, 设置级别. 古墓丽影的阴影被测试与游戏. 基准. 在较低的设置级别上差异较小, as presumably the game is less GPU heavy there. Less than a 3 从桌面系统引线, but at max settings it was now 12 更快. 通过通过游戏的同一部分进行控制测试, 在两台机器上， 以及更多的 Gpu 重标题. 台式电脑是 23 faster than the laptop at max settings. One of the biggest differences out of all titles tested. At the request of a Patreon member Ive, also compared results with RTX enabled and again a similar 21 在高设置下提升至平均 FPS.
Though the 1 low from the PC is now better than the averages from the laptop., When we enable DLSS, though the desktop was around 18 faster at high settings and the differences to 1 lows werent as big. Fortnite was tested using the replay feature with the exact Same replay file used on both machines., The difference was minor at low settings. As again the GPU presumably gets utilized less compared to the processor, but then at max settings the desktop was 23.5 faster than the laptop. The second biggest difference out of all games. 测试. Ghost Recon Breakpoint was tested with the games benchmark and the difference at max settings was below the average of all games tested at 13 better than the laptop, and this was similar throughout the different setting. Presets., 边疆 3 也测试使用游戏基准工具, and this game saw the biggest difference out of all 15 titles tested at ultra settings, with the desktop offering a 24 提升至平均 Fps. But the difference was much less at lower settings where the laptop was actually slightly ahead in average FPS at low, but either way quite close. Apex Legends was tested in the Worlds Edge map running through the Drill Site on both machines.. This test saw one of the smallest differences out of all games tested with the desktop 2070 只是 4, faster in average FPS at max settings. No major differences between the two here., 该司 2 测试使用游戏基准工具.
The desktop 2070 was seeing 19 在最大设置下的平均 FPS 较高. Then all the way down at low settings, the difference was much smaller. 怪物猎人世界测试运行通过主要城镇以同样的方式, 在两台机器上. 像其他游戏一样. The two systems were quite close together at low settings, with the laptop once more actually slightly ahead, but then at the higher levels the desktop pulls out in front, 导致 14.5 higher average frame rate at highest settings. Rainbow Six Siege was tested with the games Benchmark tool using Vulkan, and there was an above average improvement with the desktop PC, 这是 17 higher in average frame rate with the ultra setting preset. Metro Exodus was also tested using the games benchmark, and there was an above average boost from the desktop 2070 at The highest extreme preset, which was able to reach 19 平均 FPS 越高. With the RTX preset, enabled, though it was just 6 更快。. 巫师 3 实际上看到一个更大的差异， 在低设置预设的桌面 17 在平均 FPS 中领先, 然后, at the highest ultra setting preset, the desktop was 16.5 提前, so not much different, but most other games were closer together at the lowest settings Which wasnt the case here. 刺客, Creed Odyssey, was tested using the games benchmark and the difference here was one of the lowest out of all games tested, 导致 12 boost to average FPS at ultra high settings.
, Far Cry New Dawn was also tested with the Games benchmark tool and this game saw the smallest difference out of all games tested with just a 4 higher average frame rate at ultra settings. 就所有这些游戏的整体平均改进而言, RTX 2070 in the desktop was performing 16 更好. In terms of average FPS., 正如您所看到的, 性能差异可能因游戏而异. 更依赖于 CPU 的测试. 权力倾向于向底部, 差别较小, while GPU heavy games are up the top. 它的价值, 注意到，当我之前比较 1660 笔记本电脑和台式机中的 Ti, 我看到一个 15.5 差异有. And when we looked at how the 2060 compares in a laptop and desktop, 有一个 15.7 差异, 所以, 平均, between these three tiers of graphics, options were looking at a similar boost going from laptop to desktop. 游戏之外. 我也有一些 3dmark 结果和桌面是周围 15 更高的火灾罢工, 图形, 得分和 18 更高的时间间谍。. 虽然由于外形不同， 温度显然不是一个公平的比较, the desktop was 6 温度冷却器, but this will also vary based on the specific graphics card in use as cooler designs vary.. I thought this was interesting as more power typically equals more heat, and although the desktop PC was pulling 50 more power from the wall under a GPU, only stress test its still able to run cooler.
50 more power for an on average 16 boost to FPS in Games isnt that great, so it would seem that the laptop parts definitely run more efficiently in terms of wattage per frame., Despite using so much more power. The clock, speed difference, wasnt all that large between them. 笔记本电脑通常也有 CPU 和 GPU 之间的共享热管. 所以, with both under load, the desktop would have an advantage as thermals arent, 直接由相同的冷却解决方案绑在一起. 现在对于一些内容创建者, 工作量. 我已经测试了 DaVinci 解决与 Puget 系统基准和桌面得分几乎 12 高于笔记本电脑. Adobe Premiere was also tested with the Puget systems benchmark and the difference is less pronounced here, 与桌面得分只是 5 高于笔记本电脑。. 查看原始导出时间时, 虽然, 首映似乎获得了多一点改进与桌面完成几乎 6 更快。. puget 系统测试以前测试的不仅仅是导出时间，如实时播放等, but either way not much of difference. SPECviewperf 测试出许多专业的 3D 应用程序，尽管结果会因特定测试而异. 如预期的那样, 桌面在前面. 尽管差异可能因具体工作负载而异。, 价格很难比较为完整的桌面. Pc 可以配置多种不同的选项, 有, 答案是肯定的, 也广泛的范围 2070 基于市场上笔记本电脑.
我会离开. 描述中两者更新价格的一些链接。. 所以，然后, 你应该得到笔记本电脑或桌面图形? 到最后, the question as to whether or not you need a laptop depends on how much you need portability.. 如果您不需要便携性, 然后以更少的资金构建性能更好的台式电脑. 将来你也有更多的升级选项。. 如果您需要将机器带走, 那么笔记本电脑是一个更好的选择. In a laptop where were mostly limited to 1080p displays anyway. 一个 2070 is already more than enough for most people. 该 1660 Ti 或 2060 are good sweet spots for the money.. When comparing laptop and desktop 2070s In most games, the difference wasnt, actually all that large and in content creator specific tasks, it was even smaller.. Most laptops dont have a 3700X desktop processor inside. 因此，虽然我的目标是稍微比较笔记本电脑和台式机GPU, results would also differ with a more average laptop processor. 不管怎么说. Let me know what you thought of the performance differences between these two down in the comments. Would you go for a laptop or desktop PC Im interested to hear which youd get and why and if youre new to the channel, 那么别忘了订阅未来的比较和技术.