Razer Blade 15 zaawansowane – Testowane chłodzenie komory parowej!
Super max q graphics, wyniki te powinny być najgorszym przypadkiem. As far as thermal performance is concerned, air comes in through the vents directly above the intake fans underneath and gets exhausted out of the back towards the bottom edge there aren’t any exhausts on the left and right sides. W środku znajduje się kilka wentylatorów, a komora parowa. Cooler seems to cover a lot of the space. Both the cpu and gpu dies as well as vrm. Tylko zaawansowany model ma ten. The lower spec base model uses regular heat pipes. The bottom panel also has a pad that comes into contact with the ssd. The razer sign up. Software has a default mode called balanced, but you can also select custom which lets you modify the cpu and gpu performance independently of each other. The cpu can be toggled between four levels: niski średni wysoki i zwiększyć, while the gpu has three modes: Niskie, medium and high. It doesn’t seem that we get fan control in custom mode, choć możemy go trochę zmienić w domyślnym trybie zrównoważonym. Jeśli ustawimy go na ręczny, none of these modes applied any overclocks to the gpu. jednak, the blade does make use of nvidia’s new max q dynamic boost, ale to powiedział, i never saw it boost above 90 watts with a gpu only load running. I haven’t tested undervolting as i’m, using the latest 1.04 bios at the time of testing, which has apparently disabled this.
I didn’t test the older bios, but could at least confirm that it’s disabled in the current version, with no option in the bios to enable it thermals were tested with a 21 degree celsius. Ambient room temperature idle results down. The bottom were fine worst case stress tests were done with the ada64 cpu stress test, with cpu only checked and the heaven benchmark at max settings. Jednocześnie, while gaming was tested with watchdogs too, as i find it to use a good combination of processor and graphics before we look at the temperatures and clock speeds, i think it makes sense to first look at the power levels. The gpu seems to be capped to 80 watts in balanced and medium modes. Ciekawe, with both the cpu and gpu set to low, the gpu would go to 85 Watów, co może być spowodowane max q, dynamic boost taking advantage of the processor using less power. W przeciwnym razie, the gpu would run at 90 watts when set to high mode. The cpu, Z drugiej strony, biegał w 25 watów w trybie niskim 35 watów w trybie zrównoważonym lub średnim 45 watów w trybie wysokich, następnie tryb boost będzie wcisnąć to powyżej 50 watts thermals permitting. Kiedy spojrzymy na temperatury tych samych testów, the default balanced mode wasn’t too bad but running with both the cpu and gbu set to low, was cooler running both at medium increases temperatures, while setting both to high raises this further.
Zgodnie z oczekiwaniami, more power equals more heat when we set the cpu to its highest boost mode, chociaż rozpoczyna dławienie termiczne w teście warunków skrajnych. The game was intermittently hitting thermal throttle limits, ale średnia była nadal poniżej stałej 95 degree celsius cap. Seen in the stress test, with the cooling pad in the stress test, procesor nadal osiągał limity termiczne, chociaż, podczas grania, this did lower it by a couple of degrees. Są to średnie prędkości zegara podczas tych samych testów. The gpu speeds are lowest in balanced and medium modes due to the 80 limit Wat. The cpu clock speeds also follow what we saw in the power limits earlier. Higher speeds are possible with more power. The results are pretty similar to the lenovo 7i that i recently tested around 3.6 gigahertz over all 8 rdzenie średnio. W tych najgorszych przypadkach, Testy, cpu only performance is where things start going downhill, chociaż, with a cpu. Only stress test running in the gpu now idle we’re, seeing 55 waty trafione w najlepszym przypadku, boost mode pretty similar to what was possible with the gpu active in the results we just looked at. This does mean that it’s not getting hot when we’re smashing the processor though, but this comes at the expense of less performance we’re only just hitting 3.2 gigahertz over all eight cores in this test, który jest szczerze dość słaby. This becomes clear when we look at how the blade compares against other laptops, keep in mind that this is an 8 podstawowy laptop, but the multi core result is more in line with what we’re, seeing from 6 podstawowe opcje.
Wynik jednego rdzenia jest co najmniej lepszy niż 6 podstawowe opcje, ale w porównaniu z większością innych 8 core laptops above it it’s, not anything special, you might remember. I wasn’t super impressed with the lenovo 7i’s performance, but that’s still 800 points higher with the same processor here’s, how cinebench scores with the different performance modes in use, so we’ve got the option of further capping the performance for a cooler system. If that’s your preference, when we look at how an actual game performs in these different modes, though there’s not too much of a difference, and it was possible to boost average fps by around five percent by overclocking the gpu and using a cooling pad. Jeśli złapałeś mój test porównawczy gier wideo wczoraj, where i tested 20 gry na tej maszynie, the blade does actually stack up quite nicely when compared to other laptops in actual games. The cpu power limit is reasonable when the gpu is active, but it seems quite low in a cpu only workload as for the external temperatures, where you’ll actually be putting your hands at idle it’s in the low 30s normal stuff, with the stress test running in the Same balanced mode, jego, quite warm in the center and hot up, the back it’s cooler in medium mode as the fans are higher, while maintaining the same power limits. Medium było bardzo podobne do niskich. Następnie wysoki jest ponownie podobny. Pomimo wentylatora, speed increase the wrist rest areas are warm as it’s metal, więc ciepło jest prowadzone, the wasd area remains cool, jak powietrze jest wciągane przez klawiaturę, and the middle is just warm.
Zasadzie, tylko plecy się nagrzewają, but you don’t need to touch there. Let’S have a listen to those fans. The fans were only just audible when idling balanced mode was running quieter than low in medium modes, który wyjaśnia, dlaczego tryb zrównoważony działał w wyższych temperaturach. Despite the same power limits as medium mode, i found that manually setting max speed in custom mode was the same as using high plus high and boost plus high, co, jako maksymalna głośność, jest cichszy niż wiele innych tam. As we’ve seen, the performance from the razer blade 15 advanced in games is quite good. Despite having nvidia’s max q dynamic boost, i wasn’t seeing the 2080 super max q boosting above 90 Watów. This is what others like the zephyrus duo: 15 runner with dynamic boost disabled. Spodziewałem się więcej jak 100 do 105 watts in a gpu only load but never saw above 90.. This is probably because the blade is thinner than most others and there’s. Tylko tyle mocy można mieć w mniejszej przestrzeni, that’s always going to be a trade off. Dodatkowo, razer appears to be prioritizing a quite a system – well at least relatively quieter when compared to say the duo 15 ponownie, which is a fair bit louder, with boost plus high enabled in cpu plus gpu loads. Podobnie jak w grach, temperatury były wstawanie tam z chłodnicy komory pary. So this combination may be why the gpu doesn’t boost higher.
The main issue i have with the blade is the performance when under cpu only loads, to maxes się na 55 Watów, despite there being plenty of thermal headroom available just for context. The lenovo 7i uses 60 watów dla trybu wydajności średniego poziomu, while the duo 15 wykorzystuje również 60 watów dla trybu średniego poziomu, następnie do 90 in the highest mode. It makes sense to have a higher power limit for cpu only tasks when the gpu is idle, but the blade seems to just have the same power limit set, regardless of whether or not the gpu is active, a to negatywnie wpłynie na to w procesorze, intensive workloads, Like rendering or video editing sure enough, if we check out the results from the puget system’s photoshop benchmark, the blade is near the bottom, with much lower spec machines despite having higher specs inside. This is a cpu heavy test, but due to the 55 limit watów dla 8 układ rdzeniowy, we’re getting beaten by a surface book with 1660 ti max q in a workload that’s more gpu heavy like davinci resolve, though the blade is scoring much better and is Closer to the top of the graph, it would be nice if this was modified in a future bios update, but yeah no idea if that’ll happen, it’s also a little disappointing. That razer appears to have removed under vaulting support in a bios update. Aby być uczciwym. They definitely aren’t alone in this and it’s likely due to the plundervolt security vulnerability, but others like msi and lenovo are at least giving the user the choice of enabling this through advanced bios settings.
So it would be nice to see it return there anyway.