But what are the differences between them and is it worth paying more for the X In this detailed comparison? Bien, look at the differences in games and applications both at stock and while overclocked, to help you decide which to get. Empecemos con las especificaciones.. Both CPUs have 6 núcleos y 12 threads are unlocked and have the same amount of cache.. As for the differences, the 3600X has higher base and boost clock speeds and is listed with a higher TDP.. Ambas CPU se probaron exactamente en el mismo sistema, so the only difference was the CPUs and their coolers.. Both CPUs were tested with the Asrock Taichi X570 motherboard, con 16 gb de DDR4 3200 memoria que se ejecuta en doble canal en CL14, con un Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti. Ive tested both CPUs with the stock coolers that they come with in the box, as well as the thermal paste That comes pre applied, as I figure most people will probably end up using these.. el 3600 comes with the Wraith Stealth and the 3600X comes with the larger Wraith Spire.. This difference in cooling capacity also seems to be why the X model is listed with a higher TDP as well see its not actually that much more powerful. Las pruebas se completaron con la misma versión de Windows, Controladores Nvidia y BIOS para cada CPU, all of which were The latest available version at the time of testing. Ive tested both CPUs at stock and overclocked.. I managed to get my 3600 Para 4.

1GHz and the 3600X to 4.2GHz, but this was a limitation of the coolers. Ive been able to get my 3600 to 4.2GHz with an AIO in the past. But as youll see later, the temperatures get quite high with the smaller cooler, which is why the max overclock was 100MHz less.. Con eso en mente, bien, primero echa un vistazo a las diferencias en varias aplicaciones, así como el consumo de energía y las térmicas, seguido de pruebas de juego a resoluciones 1080p y 1440p. Luego, a continuación, terminar comparando un poco de rendimiento por dólar. Métricas. Empecemos con Cinebench R20. Tengo los resultados overclockeados en la mitad superior del gráfico, mientras que los resultados de las acciones están en la mitad inferior.. Como era de esperar, the 3600X is coming out ahead due to those higher clock. Velocidades., As both CPUs have the same core count, though theres not too big, of a difference. En stock. The 3600X was around 5 más rápido que el 3600, both in single and multicore performance.. Una vez que ambos están overclockeados, though this lowers to just a 2 Conducir. Su valor, noting that the single core results are lower with the overclocks applied on both CPUs. This is because manually overclocking, todo 6 cores to the same speed is actually lower than what both can boost to out of the box in single core workloads., Aunque Cinebench R15 ha sido reemplazado por el nuevo R20, I wanted to also include the results of This one too, as many other people, are still using it, and that may allow you to compare my results.

At stock theres, a similar 5 gain to single core performance. Just like in R20, Aunque, multicore was only 3 ahead with the 3600X., Una vez que ambos están overclockeados, the gap closes in with both single and multicore scores. On the 3600X, no more than 2 por delante de la 3600. Again weve got lower single core performance when manually overclocked. As this prevents, the higher boosts speeds that can be hit in single core workloads. Ive tested Blender with the BMW and Classroom benchmarks, and this is a test that works better with more cores. As weve got the same core count, theres only a small difference due to The clock, speed changes. At default stock speeds. The 3600X was completing both tasks 4.5 más rápido que el 3600. Sin embargo, once both are overclocked, the 3600X is only around 2 Adelante. Handbrake se utilizó para convertir un archivo 4K a 1080p y luego un archivo 1080p diferente a 720p.. Esta es otra carga de trabajo que se beneficia de más subprocesos, so the results are pretty close together, as both CPUs have the same 6 núcleos de 12 Hilos. En stock. The 4K task completed just 3.7 faster on the 3600X and 2.6 faster for the 1080p task.. When overclocked the difference dropped to 2.1 y 1.6 respectivamente, so hardly any real difference between these two chips. Adobe Premiere se utilizó para exportar. One of my laptop review videos at 1080p and the results between the two CPUs were again very close here.. The 3600X was completing the export 3.

6 más rápido que el 3600 at stock speeds, bajando a un 2.2 faster export time, with both processors, overclocked. También he probado el efecto estabilizador warp en Adobe Premiere. Básicamente, esto procesa un archivo de vídeo para suavizarlo.. This is a single core workload and, as my manual all core overclocks, technically lower the single core boost speed, as we saw in the Cinebench results earlier, I havent bothered testing the manual overclocks as theyd just be worse. En esta prueba. The 3600X was 3.7 más rápido que el 3600.. This is the first time Ive attempted to test Photoshop using the Puget Systems benchmark tool.. el 3600 was seeing no major difference once overclocked and the 3600X actually got worse performance with the overclock applied. So not sure if some components of this test may favour single core performance, which my manual overclock will lower. He usado 7 Zip para probar las velocidades de compresión y descompresión. As another test that favours additional cores were again seeing close results, just small differences due to the clock. Velocidades. En stock, the 3600X is around 2 más rápido que el 3600. Entonces, when overclocked compression is only 0.3 Rápido, but decompression actually saw an increase to 3.2. VeraCrypt se utilizó para probar las velocidades de cifrado y descifrado AES. En stock. Both were very close in encryption speeds margin of error difference realistically, while decryption saw a 5 higher speed with the 3600X.. This was another test where I didnt bother with overclocking, as in the past Ive found overclocking to produce strange results with this test, such as worse speeds.

. The V Ray benchmark is another multicore test that relies on thread count to boost performance and, as a result of both having the same core count and close clock speeds. The 3600X was 2.7 más rápido que el 3600, both at stock and when overclocked. The Corona benchmark, uses the CPU to render out a scene and like most of these other applications is a multicore test. So there were no major differences.. The 3600X completed the render task 2.8. Faster than the 3600 at stock and 2.2, faster with both CPUs overclocked or in other words, from just 4 segundos, faster to 3 seconds.. Estas son las diferencias entre la 3600 and 3600X CPUs. En todas estas aplicaciones, como podemos ver, results depend on the specific workload. En stock. In almost all of these tests, the 3600X was coming out ahead as expected, due to its higher clock, Velocidades. Single core performance tended to do better due to the different single core boost speeds of each chip.. Once we overclock both CPUs on all cores, the difference between the two CPUs narrows in a bit putting the 3600X just 2 más rápido que el 3600 en promedio, so a pretty small difference and not really a good start for the X version. Ive. También se midió el consumo total de potencia del sistema de la pared mientras se ejecuta el punto de referencia de Blender. En stock. The 3600X was using 4.9 más poder que el 3600, which almost scales with the 4.5 faster speed that it scored in this test.

Con ambos overclocked. The 3600X was now using 3.3. More power, but the difference in actual blender performance was closer to 2 Ahora.. Estas son las temperaturas de la CPU con las mismas pruebas de licuadora en ejecución., Both at stock and while overclocked the 3600X was significantly cooler.. My 4.1GHz overclock on the 3600 on the stock cooler was probably a bit optimistic, though it was perfectly stable under all of these tests.. The main reason the 3600X is running cooler despite performing better, is down to the coolers. The Wraith Spire that it comes with is just physically larger than the Wraith Stealth that comes with the 3600.. Como se mencionó anteriormente, I couldnt push the 3600 any higher in blender due to thermal limitations with the stock cooler, but I could reach 4.2GHz with an AIO.. Por lo tanto, with a better cooler and both CPUs running at the same speed, Id expect no difference in performance.. These are the average clock speeds during the blender stress test, so overclocking the 3600 could get it to hit the same speeds as the stock 3600X, Aunque, due to the better cooling, the 3600X did occasionally boost up a little more. Anyway at stock. el 3600 was on the warmer side, pero todavía utilizable. If you want to overclock an aftermarket cooler might be worth looking into, though the results from the 3600X already show that theres not too much extra to gain.. This testing was, with the stock thermal paste that came pre applied to both coolers different paste could likely further improve performance.

Vamos a entrar en los resultados de los juegos. Next Ive tested these games at max settings at both 1080p and 1440p resolutions. Bueno empezar con los resultados de las acciones. Then look at precision boost overdrive results, Luego. Shadow of the Tomb Raider fue probado con el punto de referencia incorporado en los ajustes más altos.. En todos los próximos gráficos de juegos, Ive got the 1440p results shown on the upper half and 1080p results below.. En esta prueba. There was basically no practical difference: sólo 1 FPS, de cualquier manera. Assassins Creed Odyssey was also tested with the built in benchmark at max settings.. Otra vez, the difference between the two was extremely small within 1 FPS in terms of average FPS and slightly higher differences for 1 Bajo. Campo de batalla 5 was tested in campaign mode at ultra settings with the same test done on both CPUs.. The results are even closer here: son, essentially the same its too close to definitively say ones better than the other. Borderlands 3 fue probado con el punto de referencia incorporado en la configuración ultra., Again just a 1 FPS or so difference between these two CPUs. Nothing amazing going on here. Fortnite was tested with the replay feature and the same replay was used on each CPU., Although it appears theres a bigger difference, its just because the frame rate numbers are higher than the ones previously seen in terms of percentage change, Hay. Básicamente, no hay diferencia. CSGO se probó con el punto de referencia FPS ulletical, and I thought this one would be interesting. Given single threaded, CPU performance seems to matter more here compared to many other titles.

Efectivamente. Hubo un 11 improvement to average FPS at 1080p with the 3600X, pero como hemos visto, this is the only game so far to see any sort of difference. Ive also tested out Rainbow. Six Siege, with the built in benchmark., Like most of the other games, were back to seeing no noteworthy differences between the two CPUs. Weve also got the option of enabling PBO through the Ryzen Master software, with both CPUs. Ive retested Battlefield 5, and we can see just A tiny improvement over stock settings at 1080p, with both CPUs and due to this insignificant change, I havent bothered retesting all of the other games as its hardly making a meaningful difference. Aquí. I also havent tested with manual overclocks, like I did with the multicore applications earlier. As Ive found, many games benefit more from PBO with Ryzen, as they still get to keep their higher single core boost, speeds.. Básicamente, to summarize the gaming differences, there are no real differences; either CPU will perform essentially the same in games, so that just leaves us with the final difference. The price. Los precios cambiarán con el tiempo. Puede encontrar precios actualizados vinculados en la descripción. At the time of recording the Ryzen. 5 3600 va a 200 USD, while getting that extra letter X and better cooler is going to cost an extra 35 o 17.5 más dinero, at least with the current sale. If youre paying the full MSRP of 250, su 25 más dinero.

, These are the dollar per frame values at 1080p averaged out over all games tested.. Básicamente, this just shows that the 3600 is better in terms of value, su 35 Para 50, cheaper and, como lo vimos, performed essentially the same as the 3600X for the most part. So this makes sense. No todo se trata de juegos, though Ive also chosen Handbrake performance to compare, as this is a real world workload that scored about right on average out of all applications tested. In terms of value, el 3600 is again winning.. The 3600X was performing 3.7. Better in this test, but if you buy it at the sale price, su todavía 13 less value or over 20 more in terms of dollar per frame at the full MSRP., With both CPUs overclocked, la diferencia entre ellos, doesnt really change, as the overclocks didnt make too Much difference., el 3600 is still ahead in terms of value here, without sacrificing much performance at all.. That last sentence is basically the conclusion., Although the 3600X does perform slightly better out of the box, en particular, in terms of single core speeds. The extra price makes it difficult to justify compared to the 3600. Eres, also getting the better stock cooler with the 3600X. But I dont think thats worth 35 Para 50 USD when you could instead put that budget into an even better aftermarket option.. Por lo tanto, para resumir, based on the current prices, I wouldnt consider buying the 3600X unless the prices were much closer together.

The small improvement in performance just doesnt seem to be worth it both when we look at it in terms of gaming or other productivity workloads.. Déjame saber qué CPU que querías elegir y por qué? Abajo en los comentarios, el 3600 or 3600X, and if the 3600X Im really keen to hear why its worth the extra moneyor maybe it was just on a great sale, Tengo más comparaciones de CPU en el camino.