I wanted to mention that there's two 8 gig sticks of ddr4 memory running at 2600, 66 megahertz in dual channel the stock configuration present in my unit. All testing was done at 1080p. The native resolution of the laptops display with facing disabled with that out of the way let's check out some gaming results, starting out with fortnight, I was able to utilize the 144 Hertz refresh rate of the display at high settings or lower. However, to me, it still ran really well at max settings to the 1 lows can drop quite a bit compared to the averages, as this game greatly depends on what's going on and what other players are doing, which also means you need to take the results with A grain of salt overwatch was fairly similar in terms of the average frame rates just playing with the bots. We were able to surpass the refresh rate of the display at high settings or lower, and the one percent lows aren't very low here, so it basically always felt nice and smooth csgo was averaging well above what the refresh rate of the display could output. The 1 lows drop down a lot in this test due to the smokes but they're still fairly high and can be improved by dropping the settings down. Pub G was tested using the replay feature, but again take these results with a grain of salt as like fortnight, it will depend on what's going on in the game, so the results can vary quite a lot, as shown by the one percent lows, which are quite A bit lower than the averages.

This was my first time testing, far cry 5 due to popular demand and I'm. Just using the built in benchmark, the frame rate seems pretty decent and while having a quick play, it seemed to run pretty well. Dota 2 was tested using a fairly intensive replays, so this should be a West case scenario. Realistically, you'll probably get better results than this, while actually playing and even in this intensive test, we're always averaging above 100 FPS Rainbow six siege was tested with the built in benchmark and West sink white high frame rate at all setting levels, and while the 1 lows Are a fair bit behind realistically they're still quite high, so it should play great with the 144 Hertz screen. Battlefield 1 also run quite well. However, although the average frame rates were quite higher, the 1 lows can drop down quite a bit during intense fights. However, to me, it still felt by some smooth if an 80 FPS dips aren't that terrible, at least from someone that mostly uses a 60 Hertz monitor The Witcher 3 doesn't really need a high frame rate to enjoy and divin on ultra settings. To me, it played great. However, we can improve the frame rates quite a bit by lowering the settings if needed. Rise of the Tomb Raider was tested with the built in benchmark, and the results are quite good with therefore, 100 FPS 7 at maximum settings. Ghost Recon is a fairly resource intensive game and was again tested with the built in benchmark.

All their ultra settings are quite low. This is always the case in this game: a very high or lower. It was definitely playable despite the occasional dips, as shown by the 1 lows. Watchdogs, 2 is another fairly resource intensive game. That is another that I personally think doesn't need a high frame rate to play. Personally, I can play this with 40 FPS averages, no problem so with 1 lows higher than their 7 at Ultra settings that played really well. Du was tested using Vulcan and even at Ultra settings I was able to average above the refresh rate of the display to me. It always felt nice and smooth even during intense fights, shadow of war was another game tested with the built in benchmark, and I think these results are more than enough to play the game even with fairly high settings. Ashes of the singularity was also tested with the built in benchmark and again, these results are fairly good for this game. On a laptop overall, I thought the results from the Auris x5 were pretty impressive. In many games were actually able to make use of the 144 Hertz screen with fairly decent settings, especially in the eSports titles. I haven't yet tried under bolting or overclocking I'll cover those in future videos, but this is how the laptop performs out of the box, which, to be honest, is probably how most people will probably end up using it. So this is where you can at least expect at a base level.

So how do you guys think the Auris x5 did in these games? I thought the 8850 H CPU and Nvidia 1070 graphics may a pretty powerful gaming combination in a laptop. It can basically play any game at decent settings. No problem, let me know what you guys still have down in the comments and don't forget to subscribe for the full review of the Auris 5 xb8 gaming laptop as well as future tech.