Ugh man, the power went out, and I was in the middle of a ranked game. I lost a bunch of unsaved files too. Really I didnt notice kind of busy here. Hang on. How are you still playing without power? Oh its, the APC UPS uninterruptible power, supply. Uh. What does that do Its basically battery backup for my gaming PC? All my hardware is automatically protected against power loss and surges with a stable power source and thats. Why I dont lose unsaved data or get kicked from online ranked matches like you. Wow. I need one of those You can check out APC UPSs with the sponsored link in the video description. Uh, this isnt one of your videos. This is real life. Yeah thats. What they want you to think. Dont! Let a power outage ruin your game stay connected at all times with an APC UPS. Back to the comparison.. The key difference between these CPUs is, of course, the core and the thread counts. Both have 32mb of L3 cache, but the 3700X has a little more L2 cache.. The 5600X has higher base and boost clock speeds and both are 65 watt parts.. The 3700X is currently just 25 more than the 5600X, but Ive seen the 3700x under 310 and the 5600X currently has availability issues close to launch.. Both processors were tested in the same system., Ive tested with 32gb of DDR4 3200 memory running in dual channel at CL14 and with MSIs GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X, Trio, graphics, card to minimize bottlenecks.

. Both processors come with an adequate cooler in the box, but theyre different. So Ive tested with my Fractal S36 AIO with Noctua NT H2 thermal paste for comparable results. Ive tested both CPUs at stock and with the following all core overclocks applied.. I was able to push the 5600X 400MHz higher than the 3700X granted. The 3700X does have more cores to power., With that in mind, well, first check out the differences in various applications as well as power draw and thermals followed by gaming tests. Afterwards, then finish up by comparing some performance per dollar metrics., Starting out with Cinebench R20. We can see the 5600X was scoring 18 higher in single core. Due to the improvements associated with Zen 3.. The 3700X was still 11 faster when it came to multicore, though, however, this honestly doesnt seem like that much given. It also has 33 more cores. Once both are overclocked. The 3700X was only 8 ahead in multicore. Now, as the overclock on the 5600X is able to go a bit. Further. Ive also tested the older Cinebench R15, as a lot of people still use it. So you can compare my results: the margins werent too different to R20, so lets move on., Ive tested Blender with the BMW and Classroom benchmarks.. This test makes use of all cores, so its no surprise that the 3700X is completing all tasks faster with its higher core count. Granted, it was only around 15 faster in the longer classroom test and a similar margin with both overclocked.

. The V Ray benchmark is another core heavy rendering workload. However, at stock, the 3700X was only 8 faster than the 5600X and with both overclocked, the 3700Xs lead lowers to 6, which I think is a seriously impressive result. When we keep in mind that the 5600X has two less cores., The Corona benchmark also uses the processor to render out a scene and again the differences between the two arent that big considering the 3700Xs higher core count.. It was less than 9 faster at stock and 8 faster with both overclocked. Handbrake was used to convert one of my 4K laptop review videos to 1080p.. Again, the extra cores from the 3700X allow it to do better with an above average difference here, but still nothing too large.. The 3700X was completing the task 16 faster at stock, then 12, faster with both overclocked. Adobe Premiere, was used to export. One of my laptop review videos at 4K., Ive tested with both VBR 1 pass, which should make better use of hardware acceleration compared to 2 pass.. The differences in 1 pass were very small. The 3700X was only 4 faster at stock, though in the 2 pass test. Its 12 faster. Ive also tested Adobe Premiere, but with the Puget Systems benchmark tool. As this tests for more things like live playback rather than just raw export times., The 3700X was only scoring 8 higher at stock and just 5 higher, with both overclocked. So not too big of a difference given this is 6 versus 8 cores.

Adobe Photoshop was also tested with the Puget Systems benchmark tool.. This test tends to favour single core performance and, as weve seen, Zen 3 is certainly delivering in that regard. So it was no surprise to see the 5600X dominating this test and reaching a 17 higher score than the 3700X at stock. Ive used 7 Zip to test compression and decompression speeds.. There was basically no real difference in compression the 3700X actually backtracked a bit when overclocked putting it behind the 5600X. However, the 3700X was further ahead in decompression 9, faster at stock and 7 faster with the overclocks. VeraCrypt was used to test AES encryption and decryption speeds, and this test saw the biggest difference out of all applications in favour of the 3700X. At stock. The 3700X was over 33 faster, but then with both overclocked, this lead lowers to around 25, better, so still a big win, but the better overclock on the 5600X allows it to gain some ground. Microsoft Excel was tested using the Hardware, Unboxed large number crunch test, and Then they were both about the same at stock, so it makes sense that the 5600X was then faster with both overclocked due to the superior overclocking result., Like other single core tests, the 5600X was doing better here in Geekbench single core too.. The 5600X was scoring more than 20 higher than the 3700X at stock in single core and nearly 24 better, with both overclocked.. The extra cores in the 3700X still give it the win for multicore, though allowing it to score 9 higher at stock.

Heres. How these two processors compare in all applications tested at stock.? The 3700X was ahead in most cases, however, these are the multicore tests where the extra cores are being taken advantage. Of.. The 5600X is doing significantly better in terms of single core tests, which can be seen towards the bottom of the graph.. Once both chips are overclocked. Things swing over to the 5600X a bit as I was able to overclock it better than the 3700X, and this is something Ive found possible with the Zen 3 processors Ive tested so far.. It could, of course, just be silicon lottery, but so far Ive been able to push Ryzen 5000 further than 3000. Heres. How total system power draw from the wall looks with the blender test running. At stock. The 3700X system was using about 13 more power, and this was allowing it to complete the test 15 faster. With both overclocked, though the 5600X was consuming more power. Though again, I was able to overclock it a bit further, and this will vary based on the voltage. Youre able to run the overclock at. Higher power draw generally equals more heat and the temperatures closely matched what we just saw in the power draw graph previously. At stock. The 3700X was running a little warmer, but the 5600x temperatures really shot up with my overclock, not too bad, but it was now 10 degrees Celsius warmer than the 3700X, despite the 3700X still completing the task faster with its 8 cores.

. These are the clockspeeds being reached during these same tests, so at stock the 5600X is able to reach higher speeds.. This combined with numerous other improvements to IPC, is why the 5600X does better in single core and when overclocked, the 5600X went a little further. Lets get into the gaming results. Next Ive compared both processors in 9 games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K resolutions.. The 1080p results will, of course, be most useful for a CPU comparison. Ive just included the higher resolutions, so you can get an idea of how little the processor starts to matter.. Shadow of the Tomb Raider was tested with the games benchmark tool.. The improvement seen at 1080p with the 5600X, was one of the best out of all titles tested with an average frame rate 30 higher than the 3700X. At 1440p. The 5600X is still 15 faster, but then at 4K theres no difference between them. Same result., Microsoft, Flight Simulator was tested in the Sydney landing challenge.. The 5600X had the biggest gains out of all games tested in this one at both 1080p and 1440p resolutions.. Even its 1 lows were ahead of the averages the 3700X could offer, but again at 4K, things change and theres, really not a noticeable difference.. Ive said this before, but Zen3 is no match for Ubisofts optimizations or lack thereof. Assassins. Creed Odyssey saw one of the smallest differences regardless of resolution.. The 5600X was ahead for the most part, but its only by a couple of frames, not a big deal.

Death Stranding was tested by running through the same part of the game on both systems because thats all you do for the whole game., Like the others. Basically, the same performance at 4K, though a little better 1 low from the 5600X, then at 1440p the 5600X was 9 faster than the 3700X in average FPS and a larger 22 ahead at 1080p.. Battlefield V was tested in campaign mode, and things were much closer together. Here, however, both were basically hitting the 200 FPS frame cap at 1080p. No major differences, regardless of the resolution in use. AMD, claimed some big gains with Zen3 in CSGO. So I had to put that to the test and sure enough. The 5600X was reaching 24 higher average FPS at 1080p, 13 higher at 1440p, and even at 4K. It was still 8 ahead, though. The differences in 1 low performance were much smaller. Comparatively. Red Dead Redemption 2 was tested with the games benchmark. Once more like most of the other titles, the 5600X had a nice boost over the 3700X at lower resolutions, with a 21 higher average frame rate at 1080p and 13 higher at 1440p. But then 4K was just a couple of frames: different. Rainbow Six Siege was tested using the games benchmark with Vulkan. Again, basically, no difference in average frame rate at 4K. However, the 1 low from the 5600X was 22 faster than the 3700X, so a more stable experience. Similar deal at 1440p, but then at 1080p the 5600X had a 13 higher average frame rate, with larger 26 boost seen to 1 low.

Far Cry New Dawn was also Tested with the games benchmark and tends to depend more on the processor than some others from my testing, which explains why, even at 4K, the 5600X is still 6 higher in average FPS. The second biggest difference at this resolution. Only behind CSGO. Over all 9 games tested the 5600X was around 20 faster than the 3700X in average FPS, though this may be held back a little by the 200 FPS frame cap of battlefield V, which is why its down the bottom. In any case the 5600X, Was definitely able to offer some nice gains. Stepping up to 1440p, the 5600X was still 10 faster than the 3700X on average, though, results could vary between no change to 20, depending on the specific game.. Some titles are seeing pretty nice improvements, even at this higher resolution. With the 5600X. At 4K, the 5600X is now less than 3 faster than the 3700X on average.. The 3700X was never ahead, but the differences at this higher resolution just arent that major – and this is because the GPU is able to get to work, making the processor selection matter less. As the 5600X is both cheaper and outperforms. The 3700X in all games tested its no surprise that its offering better value in terms of cost per frame across all three resolutions tested, though, as mentioned earlier buying the 5600X at the moment close to launch for this price, could prove difficult until supply issues are resolved.

. All things considered, I think the Ryzen 5 5600X offers serious gains over what AMD had available last generation.. It blows the 3700X away in games despite having fewer cores as 6. Cores that are still fast is plenty for gaming.. It could be interesting to do this comparison again a few years from now, though, when perhaps those extra cores might make a bigger difference, but today, if gaming is the focus, the 5600X just makes more sense. Its cheaper and performs better.. If you already have the 3700X, it could be worth upgrading for games, especially if youve already got a motherboard that can take Zen 3. Outside of gaming. The 5600X wasnt too far behind the 3700X in multicore workloads. Improvements in other areas just allow it to make up significant ground over the 3700X, despite having 2 fewer cores.. If you really do need the best multicore performance, though then, the 3700X does still make more sense. There, but outside of that, the 5600X was much better in single core performance and for less money. Overall, I think the 5600X is the way to go for most people who arent smashing all cores all the time. Ive also compared the 5600X against the 3600. In this video over here, its definitely worth checking out. If you want to see how Zen 2 compares with Zen 3, when both processors have the same core and thread count so Ill see you over in that video.. Otherwise, if youre new to the channel then get subscribed for future comparisons and tech.